AgiBot Brings Real‐World Reinforcement Learning to Factory Floors

Shanghai-based robotics firm AgiBot has taken a major step toward bringing artificial intelligence into real manufacturing. The company announced that its Real-World Reinforcement Learning (RW-RL) system has been successfully deployed on a pilot production line run in partnership with Longcheer Technology. It marks one of the first real applications of reinforcement learning in industrial robotics.

The project represents a key shift in factory automation. For years, precision manufacturing has relied on rigid setups: robots that need custom fixtures, intricate programming and long calibration cycles. Even newer systems combining vision and force control often struggle with slow deployment and complex maintenance. AgiBot’s system aims to change that by letting robots learn and adapt on the job, reducing the need for extensive tuning or manual reconfiguration.

The RW-RL setup allows a robot to pick up new tasks within minutes rather than weeks. Once trained, the system can automatically adjust to variations, such as changes in part placement or size tolerance, maintaining steady performance throughout long operations. When production lines switch models or products, only minor hardware tweaks are needed. This flexibility could significantly cut downtime and setup costs in industries where rapid product turnover is common.

The system’s main strengths lie in faster deployment, high adaptability and easier reconfiguration. In practice, robots can be retrained quickly for new tasks without needing new fixtures or tools — a long-standing obstacle in consumer electronics production. The platform also works reliably across different factory layouts, showing potential for broader use in complex or varied manufacturing environments.

Beyond its technical claims, the milestone demonstrates a deeper convergence between algorithmic intelligence and mechanical motion.Instead of being tested only in the lab, AgiBot’s system was tried in real factory settings, showing it can perform reliably outside research conditions.

This progress builds on years of reinforcement learning research, which has gradually pushed AI toward greater stability and real-world usability. AgiBot’s Chief Scientist Dr. Jianlan Luo and his team have been at the forefront of that effort, refining algorithms capable of reliable performance on physical machines. Their work now underpins a production-ready platform that blends adaptive learning with precision motion control — turning what was once a research goal into a working industrial solution.

Looking forward, the two companies plan to extend the approach to other manufacturing areas, including consumer electronics and automotive components. They also aim to develop modular robot systems that can integrate smoothly with existing production setups.

Keep Reading

AI

What Happens When AI Writes the Wrong References?

HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.

Ventureport Media Team

Updated

November 28, 2025 4:18 PM

The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK

It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.

Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.

Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.

But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.

Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.

Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.

As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.

Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.

Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.