Robots that learn on the job: AgiBot tests reinforcement learning in real-world manufacturing.
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:34 PM
A humanoid robot works on a factory line, showcasing advanced automation in real-world production. PHOTO: AGIBOT
Shanghai-based robotics firm AgiBot has taken a major step toward bringing artificial intelligence into real manufacturing. The company announced that its Real-World Reinforcement Learning (RW-RL) system has been successfully deployed on a pilot production line run in partnership with Longcheer Technology. It marks one of the first real applications of reinforcement learning in industrial robotics.
The project represents a key shift in factory automation. For years, precision manufacturing has relied on rigid setups: robots that need custom fixtures, intricate programming and long calibration cycles. Even newer systems combining vision and force control often struggle with slow deployment and complex maintenance. AgiBot’s system aims to change that by letting robots learn and adapt on the job, reducing the need for extensive tuning or manual reconfiguration.
The RW-RL setup allows a robot to pick up new tasks within minutes rather than weeks. Once trained, the system can automatically adjust to variations, such as changes in part placement or size tolerance, maintaining steady performance throughout long operations. When production lines switch models or products, only minor hardware tweaks are needed. This flexibility could significantly cut downtime and setup costs in industries where rapid product turnover is common.
The system’s main strengths lie in faster deployment, high adaptability and easier reconfiguration. In practice, robots can be retrained quickly for new tasks without needing new fixtures or tools — a long-standing obstacle in consumer electronics production. The platform also works reliably across different factory layouts, showing potential for broader use in complex or varied manufacturing environments.
Beyond its technical claims, the milestone demonstrates a deeper convergence between algorithmic intelligence and mechanical motion.Instead of being tested only in the lab, AgiBot’s system was tried in real factory settings, showing it can perform reliably outside research conditions.
This progress builds on years of reinforcement learning research, which has gradually pushed AI toward greater stability and real-world usability. AgiBot’s Chief Scientist Dr. Jianlan Luo and his team have been at the forefront of that effort, refining algorithms capable of reliable performance on physical machines. Their work now underpins a production-ready platform that blends adaptive learning with precision motion control — turning what was once a research goal into a working industrial solution.
Looking forward, the two companies plan to extend the approach to other manufacturing areas, including consumer electronics and automotive components. They also aim to develop modular robot systems that can integrate smoothly with existing production setups.
Keep Reading
A look at how motivation, not metrics, is becoming the real frontier in fitness tech
Updated
February 7, 2026 2:18 PM
A group of people running together. PHOTO: FREEPIK
Most running apps focus on measurement. Distance, pace, heart rate, badges. They record activity well, but struggle to help users maintain consistency over time. As a result, many people track diligently at first, then gradually disengage.
That drop-off has pushed developers to rethink what fitness technology is actually for. Instead of just documenting activity, some platforms are now trying to influence behaviour itself. Paceful, an AI-powered running platform developed by SportsTech startup xCREW, is part of that shift — not by adding more metrics, but by focusing on how people stay consistent. The platform is built on a simple behavioural insight: most people don’t stop exercising because they don’t care about health. They stop because routines are fragile. Miss a few days and the habit collapses. Technology that focuses only on performance metrics doesn’t solve that. Systems that reinforce consistency, belonging and feedback loops might.
Instead of treating running as a solo, data-driven task, Paceful is built around two ideas: behavioural incentives and social alignment. The system turns real-world running activity into tangible rewards and it uses AI to connect runners to people, clubs and challenges that fit how and where they actually run.
At the technical level, Paceful connects with existing fitness ecosystems. Users can import workout data from platforms like Apple Health and Strava rather than starting from scratch. Once inside the system, AI models analyse pace, frequency, location and participation patterns. That data is used to recommend running partners, clubs and group challenges that match each runner’s habits and context.
What makes this approach different is not the tracking itself, but what the platform does with the data it collects. Running distance and consistency become inputs for a reward system that offers physical-world incentives, such as gear, race entries or gift cards. The idea is to link effort to something concrete, rather than abstract. The company also built the system around community logic rather than individual competition. Even solo runners are placed into challenge formats designed to simulate the motivation of a group. In practice, that means users feel part of a shared structure even when running alone.
During a six-month beta phase in the US, xCREW tested Paceful with more than 4,000 running clubs and around 50,000 runners. According to the company, users increased their running frequency significantly and weekly retention remained unusually high for a fitness platform. One beta tester summed it up this way: “Strava just logs records, but Paceful rewards you for every run, which is a completely different motivation”.
The company has raised seed funding and plans to expand the platform beyond running, walking, trekking, cycling and swimming. Instead of asking how accurately technology can measure the body, platforms like Paceful are asking a different question: how technology might influence everyday behaviour. Not by adding more data, but by shaping the conditions around effort, feedback and social connection.
As AI becomes more common in consumer products, its real impact may depend less on how advanced the models are and more on what they are applied to. In this case, the focus isn’t speed or performance — it’s consistency. And whether systems like this can meaningfully support it over time.