What Happens When AI Writes the Wrong References?

It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.

Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.

Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.

But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.

Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.

Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.

As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.

Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.

Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.

Keep Reading

AI

The Real Cost of Scaling AI: How Supermicro and NVIDIA Are Rebuilding Data Center Infrastructure

The hidden cost of scaling AI: infrastructure, energy, and the push for liquid cooling.

Ventureport Media Team

Updated

December 16, 2025 3:43 PM

The inside of a data centre, with rows of server racks. PHOTO: FREEPIK

As artificial intelligence models grow larger and more demanding, the quiet pressure point isn’t the algorithms themselves—it’s the AI infrastructure that has to run them. Training and deploying modern AI models now requires enormous amounts of computing power, which creates a different kind of challenge: heat, energy use and space inside data centers. This is the context in which Supermicro and NVIDIA’s collaboration on AI infrastructure begins to matter.

Supermicro designs and builds large-scale computing systems for data centers. It has now expanded its support for NVIDIA’s Blackwell generation of AI chips with new liquid-cooled server platforms built around the NVIDIA HGX B300. The announcement isn’t just about faster hardware. It reflects a broader effort to rethink how AI data center infrastructure is built as facilities strain under rising power and cooling demands.

At a basic level, the systems are designed to pack more AI chips into less space while using less energy to keep them running. Instead of relying mainly on air cooling—fans, chillers and large amounts of electricity, these liquid-cooled AI servers circulate liquid directly across critical components. That approach removes heat more efficiently, allowing servers to run denser AI workloads without overheating or wasting energy.

Why does that matter outside a data center? Because AI doesn’t scale in isolation. As models become more complex, the cost of running them rises quickly, not just in hardware budgets, but in electricity use, water consumption and physical footprint. Traditional air-cooling methods are increasingly becoming a bottleneck, limiting how far AI systems can grow before energy and infrastructure costs spiral.

This is where the Supermicro–NVIDIA partnership fits in. NVIDIA supplies the computing engines—the Blackwell-based GPUs designed to handle massive AI workloads. Supermicro focuses on how those chips are deployed in the real world: how many GPUs can fit in a rack, how they are cooled, how quickly systems can be assembled and how reliably they can operate at scale in modern data centers. Together, the goal is to make high-density AI computing more practical, not just more powerful.

The new liquid-cooled designs are aimed at hyperscale data centers and so-called AI factories—facilities built specifically to train and run large AI models continuously. By increasing GPU density per rack and removing most of the heat through liquid cooling, these systems aim to ease a growing tension in the AI boom: the need for more computers without an equally dramatic rise in energy waste.

Just as important is speed. Large organizations don’t want to spend months stitching together custom AI infrastructure. Supermicro’s approach packages compute, networking and cooling into pre-validated data center building blocks that can be deployed faster. In a world where AI capabilities are advancing rapidly, time to deployment can matter as much as raw performance.

Stepping back, this development says less about one product launch and more about a shift in priorities across the AI industry. The next phase of AI growth isn’t only about smarter models—it’s about whether the physical infrastructure powering AI can scale responsibly. Efficiency, power use and sustainability are becoming as critical as speed.