Structured AI interviews and human judgment combine to address the global talent shortage
Updated
March 4, 2026 4:46 PM
ManpowerGroup World Headquarters in Milwaukee. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
As hiring pressures mount across global markets, ManpowerGroup is turning to technology to strengthen how it connects people to work. The workforce solutions major has announced a global partnership with Hubert, a startup focused on AI-driven structured interviews. The aim is simple: make hiring faster and fairer, without removing the human touch.
ManpowerGroup has spent decades operating at the center of the global labor market. The company works with employers across industries to fill roles, manage workforce planning and build talent pipelines. With millions of placements each year, it has a clear view of how strained hiring has become. A large share of employers today report difficulty finding skilled talent. At the same time, candidates expect more transparency, quicker feedback and flexibility in how they engage with employers.
Hubert enters this picture as a specialist in structured digital interviewing. The startup has built tools that allow candidates to complete interviews online, at any time, while being assessed against consistent criteria. Instead of relying on informal screening calls or resume filters, its system focuses on standardized questions tied directly to job requirements. The idea is to bring more consistency to early-stage hiring.
The partnership brings these capabilities into ManpowerGroup’s global operations. AI-powered interviews will now support the first stage of screening, helping recruiters identify qualified candidates earlier in the process. This does not replace recruiters. Final decisions and contextual judgment remain with experienced hiring professionals. What changes is the speed and structure of the initial assessment.
For employers, this could mean earlier visibility into job-ready talent and less time spent on manual screening. For candidates, it offers more flexibility. A significant portion of interviews on Hubert’s platform are completed outside regular office hours, allowing applicants to engage when it suits them. That flexibility can make a difference in competitive labor markets where timing matters.
The collaboration is also positioned as a step toward reducing bias. By evaluating each candidate against the same transparent standards, the process becomes more consistent. While no system can remove bias entirely, structured assessments can reduce the variability that often comes with unstructured interviews.
At its core, the partnership addresses a gap many large organizations are facing. They need scale and speed, but they cannot afford to lose the human judgment that good hiring depends on. Manual processes are too slow. Fully automated systems can feel impersonal and risky. ManpowerGroup’s approach suggests a middle path, where technology handles repetition and structure and recruiters focus on potential and fit.
The move also reflects a broader shift in the workforce industry. AI is no longer being tested on the sidelines. It is being built into the foundation of hiring operations. For established players like ManpowerGroup, the challenge is not whether to adopt AI, but how to do so responsibly and at scale.
By working with Hubert, the company is signaling that the future of recruitment will likely blend structured digital tools with human expertise. In a market defined by talent shortages and rising expectations, that balance may prove critical.
Keep Reading
Quantara AI launches a continuous platform designed to estimate the financial impact of cyber risk as companies move beyond periodic assessments
Updated
February 20, 2026 6:43 PM
A person tightrope walking between two cliffs. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Cyber risk is increasingly treated as a financial issue. Boards want to know how much a cyber incident could cost the company, how it could affect earnings, and whether current security spending is justified.
Yet many organizations still measure cyber risk through periodic reviews. These assessments are often conducted once or twice a year, supported by consultants and spreadsheet models. By the time the report reaches senior leadership, the company’s systems may have changed and new threats may have emerged. The way risk is measured does not always match how quickly it evolves.
This gap is where Quantara AI is positioning its new platform. Quantara AI, a Boise-based cybersecurity startup, has introduced what it describes as the industry’s first persistent AI-powered cyber risk solution. The system is designed to run continuously rather than rely on occasional assessments.
The company’s core argument is straightforward: not every security weakness carries the same financial consequence. Instead of ranking issues only by technical severity, the platform analyzes active threats, identifies which company systems are exposed, and estimates how much money a successful attack could cost. It uses statistical models, including Value at Risk (VaR), to calculate potential losses. It also estimates how specific security improvements could reduce that projected loss.
The timing aligns with a broader market shift. International Data Corporation (IDC) projects that by 2028, 40% of enterprises will adopt AI-based cyber risk quantification platforms. These tools convert security data into financial estimates that can guide budgeting and investment decisions. The forecast reflects growing pressure on security leaders to present risk in terms that boards and regulators understand.
Traditional compliance and risk management systems often focus on meeting regulatory standards. Vulnerability management programs typically score weaknesses based on technical characteristics. Consultant-led risk studies provide detailed analysis, but they are usually performed at set intervals. In fast-changing threat environments, that model can leave decision-makers working with outdated information.
Quantara’s platform attempts to replace that periodic process with continuous measurement. It brings together threat data, internal system information and financial modeling in one system. The goal is to show, at any given time, which specific weaknesses could lead to the largest financial losses.
Cyber risk quantification as a concept is not new. What is changing is the expectation that these calculations be updated regularly and tied directly to financial decision-making. As cyber incidents carry clearer monetary consequences, companies are looking for ways to measure exposure with greater precision.
The broader question is whether enterprises will shift fully toward continuous, AI-driven risk analysis or continue relying on periodic external assessments. What is clear is that cybersecurity discussions are moving closer to financial reporting — and tools that estimate potential loss in dollar terms are becoming central to that shift.