A new bet on early heart failure detection and why women’s health is at the center.
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:28 PM
A doctor holding an artificial heart model. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
Heart disease does not always announce itself clearly, especially in women. Many of the symptoms are ordinary, including fatigue, shortness of breath and swelling. These signs are frequently dismissed or explained away. As a result, many women are diagnosed late, when treatment options are narrower and outcomes are worse. That diagnostic gap is the context behind a recent investment involving Ultromics and the American Heart Association’s Go Red for Women Venture Fund.
Ultromics is a health technology company that uses artificial intelligence to help doctors spot early signs of heart failure from routine heart scans. It has received a strategic investment from the American Heart Association’s Go Red for Women Venture Fund.
The focus of the investment is a long-standing blind spot in cardiac care. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, or HFpEF, affects millions of people worldwide, with women disproportionately impacted. It is one of the most common forms of heart failure, yet also one of the hardest to diagnose. Studies even show women are twice as likely as men to develop the condition and around 64% of cases go undiagnosed in routine clinical practice.
Ultromics works with a tool most patients already experience during heart care: the echocardiogram. There is no new scan and no added burden for patients. Its software analyzes standard heart ultrasound images and looks for subtle patterns that point to early heart failure. The goal is clarity. Give clinicians better signals earlier, before the disease advances.
“Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is one of the most complex and overlooked diseases in cardiology. For too long, clinicians have been expected to diagnose it using tools that weren't built to detect it and as a result, many patients are identified too late,” said Ross Upton, PhD, CEO and Founder of Ultromics. “By augmenting physicians' decision making with EchoGo, we can help them recognize disease at an earlier stage and treat it more effectively.”
The stakes are high. Research suggests women are twice as likely as men to develop the condition and that a majority of cases are missed in routine clinical practice. That delay matters. New therapies can reduce hospitalizations and improve survival, but only if patients are diagnosed in time.
This is why early detection has become a priority for mission-driven investors. “Closing the diagnostic gap by recognizing disease before irreversible damage occurs is critical to improving health for women—and everyone,” said Tracy Warren, Senior Managing Director, Go Red for Women Venture Fund. “We are gratified to see technologies, such as this one, that are accepted by leading institutions as advances in the field of cardiovascular diagnostics. That's the kind of progress our fund was created to accelerate.”
Ultromics’ platform is already cleared by regulators for clinical use and is being deployed in hospitals across the US and UK. The company says its technology has analyzed hundreds of thousands of heart scans, helping clinicians reach clearer conclusions when traditional methods fall short.
Taken together, the investment reflects a broader shift in healthcare. Attention is shifting earlier—toward detection instead of reaction. Toward tools that fit into existing care rather than complicate it. In this case, the funding is not about introducing something new into the system. It is about seeing what has long been missed—and doing so in time.
Keep Reading
Quantara AI launches a continuous platform designed to estimate the financial impact of cyber risk as companies move beyond periodic assessments
Updated
February 20, 2026 6:43 PM
A person tightrope walking between two cliffs. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Cyber risk is increasingly treated as a financial issue. Boards want to know how much a cyber incident could cost the company, how it could affect earnings, and whether current security spending is justified.
Yet many organizations still measure cyber risk through periodic reviews. These assessments are often conducted once or twice a year, supported by consultants and spreadsheet models. By the time the report reaches senior leadership, the company’s systems may have changed and new threats may have emerged. The way risk is measured does not always match how quickly it evolves.
This gap is where Quantara AI is positioning its new platform. Quantara AI, a Boise-based cybersecurity startup, has introduced what it describes as the industry’s first persistent AI-powered cyber risk solution. The system is designed to run continuously rather than rely on occasional assessments.
The company’s core argument is straightforward: not every security weakness carries the same financial consequence. Instead of ranking issues only by technical severity, the platform analyzes active threats, identifies which company systems are exposed, and estimates how much money a successful attack could cost. It uses statistical models, including Value at Risk (VaR), to calculate potential losses. It also estimates how specific security improvements could reduce that projected loss.
The timing aligns with a broader market shift. International Data Corporation (IDC) projects that by 2028, 40% of enterprises will adopt AI-based cyber risk quantification platforms. These tools convert security data into financial estimates that can guide budgeting and investment decisions. The forecast reflects growing pressure on security leaders to present risk in terms that boards and regulators understand.
Traditional compliance and risk management systems often focus on meeting regulatory standards. Vulnerability management programs typically score weaknesses based on technical characteristics. Consultant-led risk studies provide detailed analysis, but they are usually performed at set intervals. In fast-changing threat environments, that model can leave decision-makers working with outdated information.
Quantara’s platform attempts to replace that periodic process with continuous measurement. It brings together threat data, internal system information and financial modeling in one system. The goal is to show, at any given time, which specific weaknesses could lead to the largest financial losses.
Cyber risk quantification as a concept is not new. What is changing is the expectation that these calculations be updated regularly and tied directly to financial decision-making. As cyber incidents carry clearer monetary consequences, companies are looking for ways to measure exposure with greater precision.
The broader question is whether enterprises will shift fully toward continuous, AI-driven risk analysis or continue relying on periodic external assessments. What is clear is that cybersecurity discussions are moving closer to financial reporting — and tools that estimate potential loss in dollar terms are becoming central to that shift.