How KIOXIA’s Memory-Centric AI Tackles Growing Challenges in Logistics

E-commerce keeps growing and with it, the number of products moving through warehouses every day. Items vary more than ever — different shapes, seasonal packaging, limited editions and constantly updated designs. At the same time, many logistics centers are dealing with labour shortages and rising pressure to automate.

But today’s image-recognition AI isn’t built for this level of change. Most systems rely on deep-learning models that need to be adjusted or retrained whenever new products appear. Every update — whether it’s a new item or a packaging change — adds extra time, energy use and operational cost. And for warehouses handling huge product catalogs, these retraining cycles can slow everything down.

KIOXIA, a company known for its memory and storage technologies, is working on a different approach. In a new collaboration with Tsubakimoto Chain and EAGLYS, the team has developed an AI-based image recognition system that is designed to adapt more easily as product lines grow and shift. The idea is to help logistics sites automatically identify items moving through their workflows without constantly reworking the core AI model.

At the center of the system is KIOXIA’s AiSAQ software paired with its Memory-Centric AI technology. Instead of retraining the model each time new products appear, the system stores new product data — images, labels and feature information — directly in high-capacity storage. This allows warehouses to add new items quickly without altering the original AI model.

Because storing more data can lead to longer search times, the system also indexes the stored product information and transfers the index into SSD storage. This makes it easier for the AI to retrieve relevant features fast, using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation–style method adapted for image recognition.

The collaboration will be showcased at the 2025 International Robot Exhibition in Tokyo. Visitors will see the system classify items in real time as they move along a conveyor, drawing on stored product features to identify them instantly. The demonstration aims to illustrate how logistics sites can handle continuously changing inventories with greater accuracy and reduced friction.

Overall, as logistics networks become increasingly busy and product lines evolve faster than ever, this memory-driven approach provides a practical way to keep automation adaptable and less fragile.

Keep Reading

AI

What Happens When AI Writes the Wrong References?

HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.

Ventureport Media Team

Updated

November 28, 2025 4:18 PM

The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK

It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.

Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.

Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.

But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.

Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.

Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.

As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.

Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.

Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.