Can innovation truly deliver affordable housing to those who need it most?
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:35 PM
Close up of a 3D printer nozzle pouring concrete. PHOTO: ICON
The affordable housing crisis has become one of the most pressing challenges of our time. Across the globe, millions of people are struggling to secure a roof over their heads. In cities like San Francisco, housing prices are so high that even middle-income families find themselves shut out of the market.
The root of this crisis lies in a persistent imbalance: the supply of housing has failed to keep pace with growing demand. Factors such as high construction costs, bureaucratic hurdles, and limited available land in urban areas have made it increasingly difficult to build enough homes quickly and affordably. The result is a market where housing remains inaccessible to millions, even as the need becomes more urgent.
Technology is now stepping in to address these challenges in ways that were unimaginable just a decade ago. From streamlining construction processes to introducing new financing models and data-driven tools, tech innovations are rethinking how homes are built, financed, and accessed. But while these advancements offer hope, they also raise important questions: can they truly address the root causes of the housing crisis, or are they simply patching up a fractured system?
The housing crisis begins with supply shortage: we simply aren’t building enough homes. Traditional construction methods are expensive, slow, and reliant on labor that is increasingly hard to find. This is where technology is making its most significant impact. Startups likeICON and Veev are leading the charge, using cutting-edge solutions to make housing more efficient and affordable.
ICON, for instance, uses 3D printing to build homes faster and at a lower cost. By printing the structure of a house directly on-site, ICON reduces waste, labor requirements, and construction time. Entire neighborhoods of 3D-printed homes are already being built, showcasing how this technology can scale.
Veev, on the other hand, focuses on prefabricated construction. By manufacturing high-quality components like walls and steel frames in a controlled factory environment, Veev eliminates inefficiencies associated with on-site building. These components are then assembled on location, drastically reducing construction time and costs. This approach mirrors the principles of mass production seen in industries like automotive manufacturing, where efficiency and scalability are key.
While building more homes is essential, access to housing often depend son financing. For many people, especially those with low or irregular incomes, the traditional mortgage system presents insurmountable barriers. Fintech innovations are stepping in to make housing financing more inclusive and flexible.
Access to affordable housing often hinges on financing, and innovative financial technology (fintech) solutions are beginning to change the landscape. Some platforms are offering new ways for individuals to transition from renting to owning, while others are introducing shared equity models that reduce the traditional barriers of large down payments and strict credit requirements. For example, companies like Point use shared-equity financing, where homeowners receive funds in exchange for a percentage of their home’s future value instead of taking on traditional debt. Meanwhile, startups are building tools that automate and simplify and revolutionizing the mortgage process, making it easier for underserved populations to access loans tailored to their needs.
Blockchain technology is also changing the game. By digitizing land titles and creating secure records of financial transactions, blockchain reduces the complexity and difficulty of accessing credit, especially for those with limited traditional credit. This is particularly impactful in regions where informal economies dominate and traditional proof of income is scarce. These tools create a pathway to homeownership for individuals who would otherwise be excluded from the system.
Beyond building and financing, technology is transforming how we understand and address housing needs. Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing risk assessment in the mortgage industry by analyzing a broader range of financial behaviors, such as rent and utility payments, to provide a more inclusive picture of creditworthiness.
At the same time, AI and big data are helping policymakers and developers make smarter decisions about where and how to build. By analyzing population trends, commuting patterns, and infrastructure needs, these tools ensure that new housing developments are built in the right places, reducing wasteful construction and improving urban planning.
For example, startups are using 3D scanning and machine learning to map informal settlements and identify buildings at risk of collapse. These insights not only improve safety but also guide investment toward areas where housing is most desperately needed.
The housing crisis is one of the most complex challenges of our time, and technology alone cannot solve it. But it can provide powerful tools to address specific pain points, from streamlining construction to expanding access to financing. Startups like ICON, Veev, and Landis are proving that innovation can lower costs, improve efficiency, and make housing more inclusive.
However, the ultimate solution lies in a combination of technology, policy reform, and community engagement. Governments must work alongside tech innovators to create urban environments that prioritize affordability, sustainability, and accessibility.
The future of housing isn’t just about building more homes; it’s about building smarter, greener, and fairer cities where everyone has a place to call home. By integrating cutting-edge technologies with forward-thinking policies, we can move closer to a world where affordable housing is not an aspiration but a reality.
The question is no longer whether technology can solve the housing crisis—it’s how we will use it wisely to create lasting change.
Keep Reading
A global survey shows robot anxiety drops when people encounter robots in real life
Updated
March 13, 2026 2:25 PM
Ameca the humanoid robot, featuring a grey rubber face. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
People often assume robots make people uneasy everywhere. But a new global study suggests something more nuanced. Robot anxiety tends to be highest in places where people rarely see robots in real life. Where robots are more visible, attitudes are often far more positive. That insight comes from a global study by Hexagon AB, which surveyed 18,000 participants across nine major markets. The research explored how adults and children think about robots and how those views change depending on everyday exposure.
In the United Kingdom, anxiety about robots is the highest among the countries studied. Around 52% of adults say they feel worried that something might go wrong when they think about interacting with or working alongside robots. South Korea sits at the other end of the spectrum, with only 29% reporting similar concerns. One factor appears to explain much of the gap: familiarity.
British adults are among the least likely to have encountered robots in real life. Only about 30% say they have seen or used one. In contrast, countries where robots are more visible tend to report greater comfort. China offers the clearest example. Around 75% of adults there say they have seen or interacted with robots. At the same time, 81% say they feel excited about the technology’s future potential.
The study suggests that attitudes toward robots are not fixed. Instead, they shift depending on where people encounter them and what tasks they perform. When robots are seen solving clear, practical problems, confidence tends to rise.
Across the surveyed countries, adults report the highest comfort levels with robots working in factories and warehouses. Around 63% say they are comfortable with robots in those environments. These are settings where tasks are clearly defined and safety standards are well understood. Acceptance drops in more personal spaces. Only 46% say they feel comfortable with robots in the home, while comfort falls further to 39% when robots are imagined in classrooms.
In other words, context matters. People appear more willing to accept robots when they take on physically demanding or dangerous work. Half of the respondents say improved safety is one of the main advantages of robotics in those environments. A similar share point to productivity gains as another benefit. Another finding challenges a common assumption about public fears. Job loss is often described as the biggest concern surrounding robotics. But the study suggests security risk worries people more.
Around 51% of adults say their biggest concern about robots at work is the possibility that the machines could be hacked or misused. That fear outweighs worries about physical malfunction or injury, which stand at 41%. Concerns about being replaced at work appear at the same level.
For many respondents, the issue is not simply whether robots can perform tasks. It is whether the systems controlling them are secure. According to researchers involved in the study, these concerns reflect how people evaluate emerging technologies. Instead of having a single opinion about robotics, people tend to judge each situation individually.
A robot helping assemble products in a factory may feel acceptable. The same technology operating in more sensitive environments can raise different questions. Dr. Jim Everett, an associate professor in moral psychology, says trust in artificial intelligence and robotics is often misunderstood. People are not simply asking whether they trust the technology, he notes. They are thinking about specific tools performing specific roles.
A robot assisting in a classroom or helping in healthcare carries different expectations than an AI system used in defense or surveillance. Even though these technologies are often grouped together in public debates, people evaluate them differently depending on their purpose.
Finally, the study also highlights another important factor shaping public attitudes: experience. When people actually encounter robots, fear often declines. Michael Szollosy, a robotics researcher involved in the project, says reactions tend to change quickly when individuals meet a robot for the first time.
The idea of an autonomous machine can feel intimidating in theory. But when people see a small service robot or an industrial machine performing a straightforward task, the reaction is often much calmer. Exposure can shift perceptions from abstract fears to practical understanding.
That shift matters because robotics is moving steadily into everyday environments. From manufacturing and logistics to healthcare and public services, machines capable of autonomous or semi-autonomous work are becoming more common.
As that happens, the study suggests public confidence may depend less on technical breakthroughs and more on visibility and transparency. Burkhard Boeckem, chief technology officer at Hexagon AB, argues that trust grows when people understand what robots are designed to do and where their limits lie.
Anxiety tends to increase when systems feel invisible or poorly understood. Clear boundaries and clear explanations can have the opposite effect. When people see robots working safely alongside humans, performing well-defined tasks and operating within clear rules, the technology becomes easier to accept.
In that sense, the future of robotics may depend as much on public familiarity as on engineering. The machines themselves are advancing quickly. But the relationship between humans and robots is still being negotiated. For now, the study offers a simple insight: the more people encounter robots in everyday life, the less mysterious they become. And once the mystery fades, the conversation often changes from fear to curiosity.